Dr. David Eagleman on why neuroscience isn’t a legal excuse.

Because people’s brains are different on the inside, Eagleman says the law shouldn’t take a one-size-fits-all blameworthy approach. “I need to emphasise that this does not mean we let people off the hook and it does not mean that a biological explanation leads to exculpation. What it means is more rational sentencing and more customised rehabilitation. It means that we don’t have to treat incarceration as a one size fits all solution, but instead, we can understand in a more refined manner how people have ended up the way they have, and what we need to do.”   Via

Dr. David Eagleman on why neuroscience isn’t a legal excuse.

Because people’s brains are different on the inside, Eagleman says the law shouldn’t take a one-size-fits-all blameworthy approach. “I need to emphasise that this does not mean we let people off the hook and it does not mean that a biological explanation leads to exculpation. What it means is more rational sentencing and more customised rehabilitation. It means that we don’t have to treat incarceration as a one size fits all solution, but instead, we can understand in a more refined manner how people have ended up the way they have, and what we need to do.”   Via

37 notes

Show

  1. wolfhayleytho reblogged this from psydoctor8
  2. staythewayur reblogged this from psydoctor8
  3. slaveoftheflesh reblogged this from psydoctor8
  4. discereetdocere reblogged this from psydoctor8
  5. thealoo reblogged this from psydoctor8
  6. creativityismental reblogged this from psydoctor8
  7. euphoricelixir reblogged this from psydoctor8
  8. blowingbubbles-atmydog reblogged this from psydoctor8
  9. neuroimagining reblogged this from psydoctor8 and added:
    Yes. Love this. Total agreement (er, at least before having read the entire source). It is beyond time to drop the whole...
  10. cheista reblogged this from psydoctor8
  11. roselovestea reblogged this from psydoctor8
  12. psydoctor8 posted this