Readin’ junk so you dont have to #8366
So there’s an article about using neuroscientific evidence to mitigate sentencing of criminals who are diagnosed as psychopaths, by a law professor, specializing in criminal law who has a LLM from Columbia. Great. So, I was going to toss a link and note the usual discrepancies I found within the paper. But swear to god, I feel like law reviews rarely make the distinction between clinical psychopaths and those having psychopathic traits, which leaves a lot of room to argue whatever point they are making. The current research is such that it’s imperative to make these clarifications, especially when talking about criminal offenders since the majority of psychopaths aren’t violent nor criminal. I’m just gonna keep truckin with my spectrum theory, thanks.
29 notes
-
constructivee-destructionn likes this
-
fairweatherlover likes this
-
anonymous-life1111 likes this
-
psychhealth likes this
-
goodvibes91 likes this
-
mamdooh14 likes this
-
vodka-on-my-jeans likes this
-
fortress-mind likes this
-
belkeris reblogged this from psydoctor8
-
thetrexdiaries likes this
-
manicsuppressive likes this
-
anormaly likes this
-
gradmom likes this
-
the-pleiades likes this
-
thebeautyofthegrave likes this
-
graceevolved likes this
-
poetic-personality likes this
-
logicianmagician said:
Lawyers are known for their deep understanding of science.
-
logicianmagician likes this
-
kittykittybangbang likes this
-
krremlindusk likes this
-
monkeyfrog likes this
-
fieldofadventure likes this
-
littleorphanammo said:
but penii
-
littleorphanammo likes this
-
crab-omelets likes this
-
lauroariel likes this
-
demodeus likes this
-
psydoctor8 posted this


