We would, it seems, be justified in imprisoning or institutionalizing them for such an act to prevent them from harming others. But the other justifications for punishment – retribution, rehabilitation, and deterrence – seem not to apply very well. By definition, a prison sentence couldn’t deter an individual from doing something he can’t stop himself from doing and rehabilitation could not change an immutable characteristic. Retribution would be even more problematically incoherent. We believe that a man must be able to do what he ought to do; we could not condemn a man for doing something that we believe he cannot choose not to do.
"Predisposition and Impulse Control" from Pedophilia, Preemptive Imprisonment, and the Ethics of Predisposition  H/T @JustinCaouette.  Recent articles about pedophilia, inborn sexual orientation, behavior, and brain wiring make is clear this isn’t about empathy for monsters, it’s about the ethics of punishing someone for their abnormalities, bottom line: impulse control and free will. 

47 notes

Show

  1. acdx28 reblogged this from psydoctor8
  2. constructivee-destructionn reblogged this from psydoctor8
  3. saraahlynne reblogged this from psydoctor8
  4. stopwishingforthesunshine1 reblogged this from psydoctor8
  5. logicianmagician reblogged this from psydoctor8
  6. darisen reblogged this from psydoctor8
  7. emergingneuron reblogged this from psydoctor8
  8. porcelain-and-fire reblogged this from psydoctor8
  9. bauhausparenting reblogged this from psydoctor8
  10. thebeautyofthegrave reblogged this from psydoctor8
  11. littlesquigglylines reblogged this from whenimreallyathundacat
  12. whenimreallyathundacat reblogged this from psydoctor8
  13. invisiblehype reblogged this from psydoctor8
  14. topretendtobetwopeople reblogged this from psydoctor8
  15. therabbittrail reblogged this from psydoctor8
  16. psydoctor8 posted this