Right. I used to talk about his work way too much, but he’s kinda fantastic in terms of his ideas in neurolaw. And that’s my area, so, yeah. I met him last year and I assume everyone has had their fill of my fascination of his work. I’ve been trying to spread it around & discuss other researchers in the area, but most remain so cautious to the point of reserved when talking about these issues - it’s almost as repetitive as I am on the other end of the spectrum. (yadda grain of salt, yadda limitations, yes/yes we know.) So it’s refreshing, inspiring and liberating for me, as a researcher, to read when someone isn’t influenced to keep the enthusiasm about developments in neuroscience turned down. This blog is probably a form of academic suicide (reputation wise), but if being passionate about my interests is wrong, I don’t wanna be right!
